The behaviors "speech, deed, and such" as expected and demanded from certain groups in America required that the author's dialogue adjust considerable. To be put more directly, the majority demand simple writing and speech from some. In fact the use of an infinitive phrase is deemed too fancy for some, such as as the term prefix, preposition, or prepend. So, at the command of his specialist and the "wise" among his community, he will simply swing his prehensile tail to the two-stepping tunes in his subconsciousness. Those taps and hand-claps on the twos and fours that make men pair upon two by two, and do-see-do, in the "squarish" arrangements of dance. Those two-beat based rhythms "too-akward" for the "get up on the down-stroke" and "get down on the down-stroke" crowd whose follow the lead of "one-three" maestros. So, with a trickle of to, too, two and a scance sighting of a twain, a pair, a couple, a double, a duo, a duet, a dipole, or a set of thoracic pulses throbbing in unison and other term describing the "two-ish" nature of American English, and it gutteralness, without the direct use of the phonetic ejaculation of "two", the author will do his best at written about what "ain't" was and what Is!
"Ain't" was a term that the fabled Miss Bessy Johnson, a school marm and strict disciplinarian, said was intended when she spoke. Her students knowing full-well that she knew Shakespeare's sonnets, better than many a Ivy School graduate. Yes, "too-well" to be spoken among those "too-far" away from a small one room school-house two miles from a tree with a trunk "too-thick" from whittling, "too-tall" for being nonthreatening, and "too-bloodstained" from escaping notice. Did he say too much? It was a term too-powerful to be stopped. And, history lesson for those too-hateful to remember, who forced "ain't" upon whom and who now uses it with a flair and disdain for those who acquire any level of learning "too" anything for their "too" contracted sensibilities or understanding. So, let "to. too, and two" reign among a "too-intelligent", "too-proud", and "too-proclaiming" people who are slowly being engulfed by those speaking two more widely spoken languages. This "too" shall be among the "ain't" and "cain't" of history. Those unique phrases arising from a hatred "too-entrenched" for liberating "two-patters" of a "two-chambered" thumping-machine driven too-oft by the wicked lust of a prescience of the "too-soon" demise of one's "too-prevalent", "too-prosperous", "too-wealthy", or simply "too-happy" birth-enemy. So, America this "too" is "to-say" good for you! In fact, "two-good" for you! While among you, the beautiful song of languages, with a richness undetected and evincing levels of learning and intellect unknown, are repeated by the sparrow, lark, cardinal, bluejay, robin, and other of those who speak what they hear with such fidelity that one wonders if they truly know what they are saying. Too unbelievable to be true. Well, the silly sounds "too obnoxious", "too-insulting", "too-inane", "too-sinister", "too-wicked", "too-ugly", and "too-idiotic" to be streaming from the mouth of those who to-oft are seen among those two or three who gather in His name, more than "two-times" a week, being during corporate worship and mid-week evening prayer, is "too-bizarre" and "too-schismatic" for reconciling in "two-eternities". Well, while those who believe that they exert more power than the one to whom they "profess" loyalty enjoy the "two, too, and too" demand of English-speakers, within given social groups. Let us not forget, the lesson history has taught on numerous occasions: psychologists rarely understand themselves, build profiles around their own warped fantasies, and were too-quick to run toward the scene of some too-contrived conflict constructed among too-"friends" who dared associate with a two-bit troublemaker in those grade,when children were "too-young" for being held responsible for mass destruction or mayhem. Too-abtruse for some, try "Being Almond like me".
Every ponder the too-ingrained practices of this era the "ultraviolet" and "ultra-violent" light of past generations. It is quite an interesting phenomenon the all of the Negro spirituals of the late-1800s and early 1900s only allow the use of the black-keys on the piano's scale. Now, a two-second glance at the too-oft expressed hatred of certain groups or members thereof, when socially permissible, and the atrocities that some say are long past, but who reverberations still linger in American historical fiction with an of a man killed for the rank "stupidity" of assisting someone in moving a chifferobe for a dime at a married woman's request. Should he not have known that her husband were more than capable? This was theft; and, within the story-line; it cost his life. This was a pattern too-common in America's past and too-well cloaked and overlooked in this age. The mere accusation of criminal activity by some were grounds for "swift justice", when the whole community knew it was a farce or pretense for some personal gain or sport. And, such antisocial acts occur this day. How could the "shapers of society" be a part of the "anti-social" influences dismantling their very masterful tower? It is too much for this author two synapse to coordinate, to resolve, or to handle. This two-stage flip-flop of thoughts too-few to count, too-weak to measure, and too-tiny for recording much starts to detect shades of language too-tragic to be true.
The famous "Chad" subtlety among Floridian vote counters during the millennial election , in a state with the "worst" history of racially-motivated lynching in America and a modern electoral commission who did not collect ballots in the larger minority and Democratic districts of the state in November of 2000, a shrouded term to incite fear which would resonate with the smile and utterance of "spose we did not count those hangin chads". Now, that man is right smart enough that he knows what a "chard" is. He is not some stupid boy. He is well-within his right mind! Think American but not too hard! That legacy of lynching what has the long-term result been. The limiting of language, richness and variety, spoken in public. Oh, mother dear, by chance, could one share that cost of limiting the phrases shared amongst the collective cellular automata of men in this dynamic collection of communication exchanges. In short, if one aborigine yawn near a camp fire and another such simple-being, incapable of any "high-reasoning" too yawns, does the ever too-present occurrence of the too many of these simplton's to expel the sounds of slumber until they too are a symphony, too frequently sounding too many soft schwas signal trouble for the modern man of much higher lineage. Boy scouts do the same thing. American families mesmerized by large screen televisions suffer the same plight. Legacy are lasting. Whether encoding in the GTACs of one's flesh, being expressed in every generation or not, behaviors are much the same.
And, if "ain't"is a part of the "bloods" that are too-blue to be told once, dare one say two times are ten too many, that they have erred, in speech or deed. Did they destroy their own language and heritage long before they too-frequently started exclaiming "too-softly" and "too-subtly" this atrocity of abolishing "the notion of separate, but equal" is ruining America's education system. These things will not work. Some things are simply beyond control. And, it is too apparent the too many of them are incorrigible to be taught, and those who can muster some level of reasoning are too stupid to do what is told, and to idiotic to know when too stop. What results is some maroon with too much education to be good for any job that any sane person in this country would reasonably allow. Saddest thing, these start imagining that they are too smart, when they were too stupid for surviving by learning more than they were told to do or do more than they were told to learn. The situation simply locks such too-simple minds. So, ain't and the masterful use of to, too, and two become the crux of modern English, simply devoid of the injections from interactions of cultures that have toted burdens while making straw-less bricks, shepherded flock using mancala, and crossed continents as recorded in oral and written histories, long lost, destroyed, or residing in the clefts and crag under conies crawls.
If one has waded through that long introduction, the conclusion rest in this one interrogative. Could a feeble-minded old man with weak-eyes trouble those too-brilliant to question with this? What is more appropriate? Doing that prescribed by scripture or modern man's proclivities? This answer is one that measures spiritual discernment.
Here is the help that America need? It helped the author. That is mostly likely why he meets the opposition that he see too-often in a town too-small to contain the sin too-grotesque for mention and too common for silence. Ain't that a foretelling of future to sadden too many of those with too much potential to expire too soon.
Too oft to two-step around too-fragile feels of adult too old to be offend by an honest opinion too-well supported by too many text held in well-esteem and regard by those too-powerful to question, but too lazy to read or too afraid of stating any assertion beyond the two sentence "public statement" approved by a group of "chiefs" too large to form a well-formed opinion, too well-structured for rebuttal. Too much, ain't it.
Enjoy the coming Seasons; if this web-post seems somewhat secular. the author will try reaching a higher plane of personal behavior, if the local populous permits such. Also, this was typed straight through without correction or editing.
The next few phrases are "ulgy" in tone and content; the nature of the English should be rather common and everyday in an country speaking a derivative of what was resident on that tiny rock in the Northern Atlantic seas. But, if we cannot speak; you cannot speak, and we all, eventually become dips. So, the earthy allusion befits the "resident evil" in vain, greedy hearts of men.
It would not be the least surprising if America, as the author knows it, from his life staring in 1970 and recording in the history available in works read during that period. many that have been re-written, in light of current reading, especially concerning the reported political motivations and events of the Vietnam War, and those proceeding it, that they very same men who wallowed in the sadistic pleasure of seeing his life's goals and dreams deteriorate, as schooling, which had never been a challenge, was repleted with artificial barriers, many being forced dosage of dopamine blockers, that inhibit the thought process, these men will hop on mount and build a campaign to rid the author of any acquired degree, respect, employment opportunity, or cent that they "say" he cannot have or approved his acquisition of. This is the nature of the American ego; this why an almondish fellow such as the author behaves in such parodoxical ways, those bests served up with a frozen stick of chocolate pudding! America you should really get a close-up look of yourself. James 1:24 (KJV)
[WTC: Men amongst the author's local community, the septum of a Heartland from which everything accept Agape flows, and its international connections, work out the details. MS Outlook, that sure is a neat subscription service for Office; it seems that corporate espionage might have Trump'd OpenOfffice; Watch out for Duwamish and Oak! This is an inside comment for a network that done plumb forgot itself long ago.]
Remember who you should look like; [Genesis 1:26 (KJV)] The author knows that many of you can quote the text left and right, up and down with historical context, with comments about variations produced in this monastery or that, at such and such, a juncture in history, with insights about the deviations in the verses presented among the faithful of that era, but do you believe enough that you would not jeopardize the lives of other for profit, control, or simply "morbid" entertainment played out within the media. And, as the author heard a old "companion", who should have let a "childish argument" with an eavesdropper stay well within the confines of 1984-85 when his female companion placed the phone on its hook, has said, such dribble is the feed of the docile and weakest of men. Pardon the paraphrase. Certainly your green satin hood and robe coupled with the power of a handshake, both of which the author shall never have an ounce of respect, has granted you an escape from any consequence of sin. [Psalm 27:1 ; Psalm 121(KJV)]
By chance, if Hooded Zappy the Pinhead read this, was not your first school psychologist assessment that you lack a full understanding of the nature of reasoning. As such, you have been "gifted" with a mega-memory for recording more facts than most mortal can hold. Yet, this superpower has a small Achille's heel, the occasional occurrence of contradictory belief. This why Fox News is more sensible than Roman, the most concise expression of theological reason found in Scripture, for someone with your unique talent. So, the fault does not reside with you; it resides with the adults who let your aggressive antics persist through a decade and a half, without usurping your legal rights as an adult that permitted your "disorganized, obnoxious, unethical, garrulous" behavior, albeit some of life's mysteries are beyond legal proof. How could such be in a land of grand opportunities? And, being somewhat jaded, by the experience, in light of the long-term human cost, the author will share that within the mystery rest the answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment