Forgive, the frequent use of I when discussing a past memory. Yet, a spouse might understand this ejaculation of the first person after years of ....
The performance of the ordinary routine domestics tasks, plus maintaining employment in support of a families financial future without any interest in being beyond the confines of a wooden kitchen floor barefoot "happy" living a life of building a future dream. Dream-building is costly and hurtful. Especially, when that is wrought with a "rebukish-whip" combined with an occasional slap. Being of significant physical stature and moderate size, the author might be labelled a whiner for not enduringan injection umeritted. Yet, those who have been the "victim" of the devil's deception and accepted the lure of illicit injectibles will tell, "the shot does not harm; the contents do!"
The "unpleasant" feel accompanied by a drug for the nullification of the assertion that this might have arisen from a conversation, note, or seminar discussion, sandwiched betwixt a preface of "Wow! Life is stranger than fiction" and salutation, "Funny, great minds must think alike!" phenomenal is! [ Where is the verb and subject in the former sentence. Does it make sense now! Break-free...feel better ]
And, much like a "basin-bound" spouse whose only true dream is being in a world were dreams come true and everyone can enjoy a few, a "person" endlessly scrubbing dish and saucer, and after the last insult, says, "Wait!" reaching for a rolling pin or skillet, fried "black-hard" with years of chicken and fish grease, "Excuse me, since "we" is not permitted in this small societal unit, and "you" is mine customary "monkey-lease" moniker! Sir, I cook, I clean, I scrub, I care for I-children because the master of I-house does not have time for it, nor claim I-children! I sanitize commodes. I polish grout. I mop tiles. I work forty hours plus for income supporting the future of everyone but I. And, who said 'What!' I must obey what order from "who"? Ever enjoy some fried "who"? Does 'who' like a warm bed that is what I was trained for by who! Who called I a harlot and I-children bastards"
"Communication becomes such in a 'we-less' social grouping. Does this sound the least-bit intelligent?"
The authors only desire was realizing a "dream" driven by the desire of making a synergistic dream economy, not necessarily financial, occur in the lives of all he met. Being such as "how is such possible" or "hey, this might work well" or "have you ever heard such. it seems possible, and so and so said that worked well for him. The position and time might be perfect for this!" And, forever the summation of a "dream thesis' completion" and "realization" was "Wow! great minds must think alike". Unfortunately, an early minor dream shared left a "rough road" ahead for a child, unaware of the "snake-pit" that, so peacefully, rested he in. Ego, avarice, and loathing-entrenched from a "light-insurrection" during the 1960s in America, sent him on a direct, downward spiral upon the tarmac's first tire thrusts. And, the "permanent-grounding" and utilization of a perfectly operation "dream-ship" that might hold the captain in the hold and his most hated foes in "international first class", beyond the curtain of rift-rafft stares. These days, the "positions are reversed" and the dirigible-overlay crafted at the command of those who could not tolerate anyone ever saying, "Did not "....." say this" Have worked from the very ideas he mentioned in a small living unit near the local medical center, so that "this assertion of 'Did not .... suggest ..." would never be accepted or acknowledged."
So, with the use of that classic-unifier "we", a term "unpermitted" in my early educational settings, before the "de-facto" segregation of that neighborhood ended circa 1976, we must supplant I, if I first discovers you, and ego-degeneration permanently prevents the same communicative-descent. So, the non-schizophrenic sound such dealing with as much. So. who hath the "problem".
A dream might, by all, had who be we, if enjoying another's "golden curtain" unopened reveals compliments and shoulder pats by all. Beyond that Monty Hall "veil" might be a fortune of gold, a goat chewing a can, or a simplistic life of "seeming drudgery" that most know. And, a peace that passes understanding might be non-present in what seemed "so special" in the eyes of those that could cry, or spit venom from the same ducts, after saying "best wishes"
If the utterance of "we" were not a crime in this local, at least in the vicinity of the author, then the "synegoism" might never be known.
.
If one ever loses track of both the "centrality and universality" found in the essence of the Trinity: "we" amongst this vibrant humankind of hearty hues scrawls the blackboard with the etch of a steel clawed glove.
"We" - Torturous, huh!
If you have discovered the Creator, could you say I had a short talk with the Lord earlier, and "we" really enjoyed the quality time! Or would it be, I told Him get me what I want when I want it. I demand! And, He did 'xactly' what I said!
Here is the litmus test for those who call others "conceited". Flattery them gradually, compliment after compliment. One this day, a few per day by the end of the month, with a rate of one per hour within three months, say "Wow! it seem that you have gotten conceited!' And, notice the response, and please do not get fired or struck. If they complain, ask if they are the only one who might deserve a compliment or encouraging word? Some individuals feel that they are the only one's who can be "conceited" or "self-confident of accomplishments" that is the softer-side of proud. And, unlike Kindergarten, everyone is not permitted "the floor". Some must maintain center stage "twenty-four" hours per day three hundred and fifty-seven days per year!
Question, What is man's purpose, based upon Solomon's summary in the verses found in the Book of Ecclesiastes.
No comments:
Post a Comment